Merge the WTA with ATP tour says Federer

Supplier of High Quality CPD Tennis Education

LATEST 2025 COURSE NEWS :  17th January - Under 10's Development21st March - Add Power to Your Serve9th May - Art of Singles12th Sept - Art of Doubles 7th November - Under 10's Development - SPACES

LATEST 2025 COURSE NEWS :  17th January - Under 10's Development21st March - Add Power to Your Serve9th May - Art of Singles12th Sept - Art of Doubles7th November - Under 10's Development - SPACES

Go to content

Merge the WTA with ATP tour says Federer

LTA Tennis Coach Accreditation Courses | MTI
Published by Andy Magrath in Tennis News · Sunday 26 Apr 2020 ·  1:30
Tags: MergetheWTAwithATPtourNickKyrgiosRogerFedererSimonaHalep
Merge the WTA with ATP tour says Federer

“Should Have Happened…” says Federer, Halep Says "Yes", Kyrgios Says "No!"

Roger Federer’s social media proposal that the ATP and WTA should merge has prompted many positive responses including that from Simona Halep and Garbine Muguruza according to the BBC.
The current lockdown climate urged Federer to claim that ‘the time is right to come together as one’.

However not all voices were in a positive mind. Nick Kyrgios stated on SM that ‘we shouldn’t merge’ and complained about the lack of consultation given to ATP players especially since the powers that be are giving Federer’s proposal much consideration.

One pioneering voice who could be considered the Godmother of women’s’ professional tennis (WTA) was Billie Jean King who stated “…Let’s make it happen”

Read the Full story here
BBC.co.uk

Roger may have a point when you consider the backlog of competition issues, sponsorship funding, player finances and the most important thing, the future safety and welfare not only of players but spectators, staff and coaches once the tours recommence.

Let’s not kid ourselves. COVID-19 is here to stay. This virus will not suddenly vanish and with a vaccine not on the horizon for many months, there will be many considerations and subsequent policies made especially when restrictions are lifted.

To have everything under one roof with one name makes sense from the outside but one can’t help thinking that internal politics and egos may well have their say before a final decision is made.

What do you think?
Andy


Back to content